Every friend group has them, the loud one who somehow convinces everyone to go to the pep rally, and the quiet one who somehow convinces everyone to actually study for the math test. But here’s the thing: both types get unfairly called out. Introverts get hit with the classic “why are you so quiet?”, while extroverts get labeled “too much” for being, well – excited to exist. At the end of the day, shaming someone for being quiet isn’t any better than shaming someone for being loud.
Think about it, the so-called “quiet kid” might just prefer listening over talking. That doesn’t mean they don’t have thoughts worth sharing, it just means they’re waiting until it matters most. And honestly, when they do speak up, half the time it’s the smartest thing said all day.
Now flip it. Extroverts are often the spark of the group, the ones starting conversations, cracking jokes, or making sure nobody eats lunch alone. But instead of being appreciated, they sometimes get called “annoying” or “attention seekers.” Isn’t that just the opposite side of the same coin? If we criticize introverts for being “stand-offish” and extroverts for being “too extra,” then nobody wins.
The truth is, friend groups work best when there’s a mix. Extroverts push the group to try new things, while introverts bring balance. One keeps things lively, the other keeps things grounded. Without both, the whole vibe falls flat.
So instead of trying to decide whether quiet or loud is “better,” maybe the point is that we need both. The talkers and the listeners. The ones who hype up the room and the ones who calm it down. After all, high school is already chaotic enough, wouldn’t it be worse if everyone acted the same?














Heaven Williams • Feb 6, 2026 at 5:22 pm
I like this article because I think I can very much relate to this 🙂